THE HAGUE, June 25 – NATO leaders convened in The Hague on Wednesday for a pivotal summit that centered around a substantial increase in defense spending—a move that closely aligns with long-standing demands from U.S. President Donald Trump. The gathering, hosted by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in his hometown, aimed to demonstrate renewed commitment to transatlantic security and reassure skeptics of the alliance’s cohesion in the face of escalating global threats.
As the security landscape continues to shift, particularly following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, NATO member states are coalescing around a new and ambitious target: allocating 5% of national GDP toward defense. The updated goal, intended to be achieved over the next decade, marks a significant jump from the previous 2% benchmark and reflects rising concern over both traditional military threats and emerging domains like cyber warfare.
Trump’s Influence on NATO Strategy
Trump’s presence at the summit has notably influenced both the tone and direction of NATO discussions. As the U.S. President, his approach continues to shape alliance priorities, with leaders adjusting their strategies to align with his assertive stance on defense spending and international commitments.
Trump’s latest remarks, made en route to the summit aboard Air Force One, again hinted at his unconventional view of NATO’s Article 5—the clause that binds members to mutual defense. “There are numerous definitions of Article 5,” he said, emphasizing his focus on safeguarding lives while stopping short of offering a full-throated endorsement of the mutual defense principle.
Though such ambiguity has sparked concern among some NATO allies, the broader commitment to significantly increase military spending has helped soothe tensions. The 5% goal, while ambitious, is broken down into 3.5% for core military operations—such as maintaining troops, weapons systems, and readiness—and 1.5% for wider defense responsibilities, including cybersecurity, critical infrastructure protection, and military mobility enhancements.
Despite these changes, not all members are on the same page. Spain, for instance, has openly stated that it does not intend to meet the new threshold, arguing that its existing contributions are sufficient to fulfill NATO obligations. However, Rutte engaged in diplomatic dialogue with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez to maintain unity, ultimately settling on a compromise that kept the summit’s momentum intact.
Behind-the-Scenes Diplomacy and Focused Agenda
A rare glimpse into summit diplomacy emerged when Trump publicly shared a private message from Rutte. In it, the NATO chief congratulated Trump for his “decisive action in Iran” and expressed confidence that Europe would meet its financial obligations, crediting Trump for what he described as a historic shift. “You’re about to succeed in a way no American leader has managed in generations,” Rutte is said to have written, reflecting just how far NATO leaders are willing to go to gain Trump’s endorsement.
To further accommodate Trump and prevent the summit from being overshadowed by disagreements, the final communique was kept concise and squarely centered on the spending pledge. While the text is expected to reaffirm NATO’s stance on Russia and voice continued support for Ukraine, it deliberately avoids delving too deeply into those topics, acknowledging Trump’s comparatively cautious approach toward Moscow and more restrained position on Kyiv.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, though not present at the main session, attended a pre-summit dinner on Tuesday evening and is expected to hold a separate meeting with Trump. Zelenskiy’s team has signaled their intent to request additional U.S. weapons—particularly Patriot missile systems—and push for tougher sanctions against Russia to curtail its war capabilities.
The backdrop to the summit was further complicated by recent military developments in the Middle East. The weekend saw the United States carry out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, and NATO leaders expressed hope that the volatile situation would not distract from their primary objective: reinforcing alliance unity and raising defense commitments.
Russia, in response to NATO’s summit and its increasing defense posture, accused the alliance of escalating militarization and portraying Moscow as an existential threat to justify the sharp increase in military budgets. The Kremlin denounced what it called the “demonization” of Russia, asserting that NATO was leveraging fear to consolidate power and justify expansion.
Despite such rhetoric, the mood among NATO leaders was one of resolve. Secretary General Rutte stressed the importance of the moment, acknowledging the financial strain of ramping up defense budgets but insisting that the strategic necessity left no alternative.
“There is absolute conviction with my colleagues at the table that, given this threat from the Russians and the current international security environment, there is no alternative,” Rutte declared on Wednesday.
1 thought on “NATO Backs Trump’s Push for Higher Defense Spending at Hague Summit”