October 19 – House Speaker Mike Johnson stood firm in his recent comments describing nationwide “No Kings” rallies protesting President Trump as “hate America” gatherings. Speaking on a Sunday political program, Johnson clarified that his remarks were not directed at Democrats as individuals but rather at the rhetoric and tone expressed during the protests.
He said his criticism was aimed at what he described as the “angry and destructive messages” coming from some demonstrators. “I’ve never labeled anyone as an enemy,” Johnson said, “yet there was plenty of anger and hostility expressed throughout those demonstrations, with some participants using aggressive and divisive language. We saw signs saying things like ‘fascists must die,’ which shows hostility toward the country and its leadership.”
Johnson Clarifies Remarks on Protesters and Democrats
When questioned about linking anarchists, antifa activists, and Hamas sympathizers to the modern Democratic Party, Johnson defended his position but said his comments were misunderstood. “I didn’t claim that every member of the Democratic Party was involved,” he clarified. “However, we must recognize the truth of what is taking place. There is a growing influence of Marxist and socialist ideas within the Democratic ranks.”
He pointed to developments in New York City as an example, criticizing Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, whom he called an “open socialist Marxist.” Johnson claimed that electing such figures showed a shift toward extreme ideologies. “It’s an objective fact that socialism and Marxism are gaining ground in parts of the Democratic movement,” he said.
Mamdani, however, has publicly stated that while he identifies as a democratic socialist, he is not a communist, pushing back on accusations of being an extremist.
Johnson also called the “No Kings” slogan ironic, saying it distorted the very freedoms that allowed the demonstrations to occur. “If President Trump were actually a king, as they suggest, these protesters wouldn’t have the liberty to speak out in public spaces,” Johnson said. “Their ability to demonstrate is proof that America protects free speech.”
Debate Over Swearing in Democratic Representative-Elect
The interview also turned to why Representative-elect Adelita Grijalva had not yet been sworn into office. When asked about the delay, Johnson cited procedural reasons, saying it would happen once the House returned to session. “As soon as we get back to legislative business, we’ll administer the oath,” he stated.
He referenced what he called the “Pelosi precedent,” noting that previous Democratic leadership had followed similar timelines. Johnson pointed out that past members elected during recess periods, such as Pat Ryan and Joe Sempolinski, were sworn in only after the session resumed. “We’re not in session right now,” he said. “Once we return, I’ll make sure the oath is administered properly.”
When pressed about exceptions made for other members, Johnson said those situations involved unique circumstances. “In rare cases, such as when members had already arranged for family and friends to attend the ceremony, an early swearing-in was accommodated. That isn’t the case here,” he said.
Reactions to Santos’ Sentence and ICE Enforcement Actions
Johnson was also asked about the recent commutation of former Representative George Santos’ sentence. He said the president has the constitutional right to grant pardons and commutations, emphasizing his personal belief in redemption. “We believe people can have second chances,” Johnson remarked. “I hope Mr. Santos uses this opportunity to rebuild his life and regain public trust.”
However, when questioned about whether political loyalty should influence clemency decisions, Johnson rejected that notion. “I don’t think that was the motive behind it,” he remarked. “The president spoke about the individual’s background and potential for rehabilitation. It’s important that these decisions are made transparently.”
The conversation then shifted to recent Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations. Some critics have raised concerns over the aggressive nature of recent raids, but Johnson defended the enforcement efforts. “No one takes any joy in seeing families separated,” he acknowledged. “But we must uphold the rule of law. ICE has focused on apprehending dangerous criminals, and there are millions who fit that description.”
Johnson added that while the optics of such operations could appear harsh, he believed the public was more concerned about border security than appearances. “The American people were deeply alarmed when the border was left open for years,” he said. “We’re now trying to restore safety and order.”
Johnson Backs Military Operations in Caribbean Region
Finally, the House Speaker addressed questions about U.S. military operations in the Caribbean, particularly around Venezuela. When asked whether he had concerns about the buildup of forces and the targeting of boats in the region, Johnson expressed strong support for the administration’s approach.
“What we’re seeing are drug cartels attempting to transport fentanyl that could kill hundreds of thousands of Americans,” Johnson said. “Our actions are driven by concerns for the nation’s security. I support a strategy of peace through strength.”
He concluded by saying that most Americans understand the need to act decisively against such threats. “We need a government that protects its people,” he stated. “I believe most citizens are grateful that our leadership is taking strong action against these dangerous criminal networks.”